Why India Didn’t Strike Pakistan After 26/11: Chidambaram Breaks Silence

Why India Didn’t Strike Pakistan After 26/11: Senior Congress leader P. Chidambaram reveals why India didn’t take military action against Pakistan after the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. International pressure and diplomatic advice shaped the decision. Read the full story here.

The 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks remain one of the darkest chapters in India’s modern history. Over three days of horrifying violence, 175 innocent lives were lost at the hands of terrorists linked to Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba. In the immediate aftermath, India faced a critical choice: respond militarily or restrain itself under international scrutiny.

https://digitalamitkaul.online/india-ananta-shastra-missile-deal-bel-border-defense/

Senior Congress leader and former Home Minister P. Chidambaram recently opened up about the government’s response during those tense hours. His revelations have reignited debates and drawn criticism from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

Why India Didn’t Strike Pakistan: Global Leaders Urged Restraint

Chidambaram revealed that India seriously considered launching a military strike on Pakistan as retaliation for the attacks. “The idea of retaliation did cross my mind,” he said in a candid interview. However, global leaders, including then-US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, advised India against taking such action.

He added, “The entire world was putting pressure on Delhi to ‘not start a war.’” This diplomatic pressure, combined with advice from India’s Ministry of External Affairs and the Indian Foreign Service (IFS), ultimately influenced the government’s decision to refrain from military escalation.

Chidambaram emphasized that the decision-making involved direct discussions with then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. While the government retained full authority over its response, international diplomatic counsel played a key role in shaping India’s measured approach.

BJP Responds

The BJP has been quick to respond to Chidambaram’s remarks. Union Minister Prahlad Joshi shared excerpts from the interview on X (formerly Twitter), criticizing the Congress party. Joshi highlighted that Operation Sindoor—the Indian military operation linked to post-26/11 action—was based on direct talks between Indian and Pakistani military commanders, not influenced by any third party like the United States.

This latest statement from Chidambaram adds another layer to the ongoing discussion about India’s strategic and diplomatic choices following 26/11. It underscores the delicate balance between pursuing justice and maintaining global diplomatic relationships.

https://aamnewsnetwork.com/now-even-a-bird-wont-escape-indian-armys-advanced-radar-system-ready-to-counter-drone-attacks/

Lessons Learned

The Mumbai attacks served as a grim reminder of India’s vulnerability to cross-border terrorism and highlighted the importance of intelligence and preparedness. While immediate military retaliation was avoided due to diplomatic considerations, India has since strengthened its counter-terrorism framework, revamped coastal security, and increased intelligence cooperation.

Chidambaram’s candid disclosures also reflect the intricate web of international relations that countries navigate in crises. It shows that even when a nation seeks justice for its citizens, global geopolitics can influence critical decisions.

The 26/11 tragedy remains etched in the collective memory of India, reminding citizens of both the horrors of terrorism and the complexities of leadership in moments of national crisis.