Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan gets relief, SC orders bail
Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan gets relief, Supreme Court orders bail.
In the criminal case, the Supreme Court has ordered bail to Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan and his son Abdullah Khan.
The court, in an interim order on Tuesday, allowed bail to Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan and his son Abdullah Khan. Both of them have criminal cases registered against them.
This order will come into force after four weeks. Meanwhile, the statement of the complainant will be recorded in the lower court of Uttar Pradesh.
Please tell that there are many other cases against Abdullah, so his release from jail is difficult. At the same time, the Uttar Pradesh government has raised objections in the case of Azam Khan’s bail.
On this, the court questioned whether custody is still needed in this case, on this, advocate SV Raju, appearing for Uttar Pradesh, told that FIR has been registered against Azam Khan in many serious cases.
However, Azam Khan’s lawyer Kapil Sibal said that the charge sheet has been filed in the 280/2019 FIR case.
Sibal said that the government has registered separate FIRs in the passport and PAN card case, while Azam Khan has got bail in the main FIR in this case.
Sibal told the court that in the case a second PAN card and a second birth certificate were made.
On this, the Uttar Pradesh government said that even after the first PAN card was present, the second PAN card was issued and the information of the first PAN card was hidden.
Uttar Pradesh government said Azam Khan is still in the hospital.
The government also said that the property worth lakhs of rupees of a person who went to Pakistan was wrongly taken in his name.
The Supreme Court refused to hear the government’s petition, said- law has to be followed with technology
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear the Haryana government’s plea against a decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, saying the law has to be in sync with technology.
High Court had approved the marriage certificate during the Corona period
The High Court had approved a marriage certificate through video conferencing under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, as the wife was unable to come to India from the US due to Corona restrictions.
Supreme Court bench said – law has to go with technology
A bench of Justices Indira Banerjee and V. Ramasubramanian said, the law has to be followed with technology.
The bench said that this law was made in 1954 and computers and the internet came many years after that.
The bench said- the law should not be made so harsh that it becomes impossible to follow it.
The bench further said that where there is a dire situation, the spirit of the law cannot be made so rigid as to make it impossible to obey.
The court said that the government departments should provide facilities to the people and should not create hindrance or obstruction for them.
