Priyanka’s Grudge Due To Incorrect Facts In A Letter
Priyanka’s grudge due to incorrect facts in the letter sent to CM Yogi, concocted politics on districts with zero posts of teacher recruitment. There have been many cases of wrong answers to the questions asked in competitive examinations. Politics has also adopted this practice. The big faces of politics are not indulging in manipulating facts to surround the government.
Priyanka’s grudge, general secretary and in-charge of Uttar Pradesh has targeted the Yogi government on the pretext of teacher recruitment. She wrote down the concoctions of the Samajwadi Party government while mentioning the pain of the candidates of zero posts in the 12460 teacher recruitment. The recruitment in which academic merit was selected, it has been claimed until the examination and candidates get good marks.
Contestants are also surprised to read the letter sent to Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath going viral. This is the second episode in five months, in which Priyanka Vadra’s claims are far from the ground reality. In the name of providing one thousand buses to the Corona disaster-affected laborers in the month of May, the number of trolleys, autos, scooters, etc. were recorded in the list they submitted to the government.
Even before the Uttar Pradesh Yogi government came to power, 12460 recruitment was done before counseling. The government had stayed the selection on 23 March 2017. On the demand of the candidates, the CM distributed around five thousand appointment letters in 51 districts on 16 April 2018.
The court was prohibited on the selection of candidates for districts with zero posts. In view of the district preference dispute, the government decided that further assistant teacher recruitment will not have district preference.
This was the case: 12460 teacher recruitment of council primary schools of Uttar Pradesh started in December 2016. Posts were vacant in 51 districts of the state, while there were no posts in 24 districts. At the start of the application, on the demand of the candidates of 24 districts, the then Basic Education Council Secretary ordered that the candidates of the districts with zero posts can apply for any district.
Candidates from other districts came up in the educational merit, due to which the candidates with less merit from 51 districts were not selected. They reached the candidate court and challenged the district preference.
It may be known that there was a provision for district preference in the rules of selection then. The court directed the selection to be canceled on the basis of district preference by canceling the recruitment. The bench of two judges stayed it. Now, this case is under consideration in the apex court.
