Rhetoric Of Hindu Terrorism Was Raised After Malegaon Case

Rhetoric of Hindu terrorism was raised, After the arrests in the Malegaon case of 2008.

It is no surprise that a political charge-and-counter attack started after a witness in the Malegaon blast case in Maharashtra.

He said that the then Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) of Mumbai forced him to name Yogi Adityanath and four RSS leaders.

He was also harassed. Then the additional commissioner of this ATS was Parambir Singh, who is facing several serious charges and is currently under suspension.

The sensational allegation made by the witness of the Malegaon case against the ATS was leveled before the special NIA court. This is not the first time such things have come to the fore.

Other witnesses in the Malegaon case have also made similar allegations.

It should also be noted that how an attempt was made to prove the innocence of Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorist Ishrat Jahan, who was killed in an encounter at the hands of Gujarat Police in Maharashtra.

It cannot be overlooked that after the arrests in the Malegaon case of 2008, the rhetoric of Hindu terrorism was raised.

In 2008 itself, after the horrific terrorist attack in Mumbai, by writing a book, a sloppy attempt was made to call this attack a conspiracy of the RSS, which shook the country and the world.

Those who made such an attempt faced embarrassment, but this showed how the attempt was being made to raise the bar of Hindu terrorism.

Union ministers of the then UPA government were also found involved in this. It was also being said from their side that Hindu terrorism has emerged.

This was the period when Rahul Gandhi himself told the US ambassador that the extremism of Hindu organizations threatens India more than terrorist organizations like Lashkar and Jaish.

In view of all this, it is not only necessary, but it is also necessary that any attempt should be made to find an answer to the question of whether an attempt was made to mislead the country and the world in the name of investigation of Malegaon case?

The answer to this question should be sought because there is nothing to be gained from accusations and counter-allegations.

It must come to the fore whether Hindu terrorism was coined for some conspiracy or for narrow political purposes?

If it is proved that Hindu terrorism was coined for some political purpose, then it will also be clear that in the name of fighting terrorism.

The security system of the country, as well as the investigative agencies, were played with.