SC Cancels Ashish Mishra’s Bail In Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case

SC cancels Ashish Mishra’s bail and he will have to surrender in a week: Lakhimpur Kheri Violence.

Union Minister of State for Home Ajay Kumar Mishra alias Teni’s son and main accused in the Lakhimpur Kheri Violence case, Ashish Mishra, has suffered a major setback today.

The Supreme Court has rejected the bail of Ashish Mishra. They have to surrender within a week.

On April 4, after hearing the arguments of all the parties, the Supreme Court had reserved the verdict after completing the hearing.

Let us inform you that Ashish Mishra was granted bail by the Allahabad High Court, which has now been rejected by the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court said that the Allahabad High Court did not take care of the aggrieved party. The aggrieved party was not heard.

After delivering the verdict, the court sent the matter back to the Allahabad High Court for a fresh hearing.

Rakesh Tikait thanks the Supreme Court.

Farmer leader Rakesh Tikait has thanked the Supreme Court for canceling the bail of Ashish Mishra in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case.

Tikait said that the court felt that the UP government had not furnished the facts, hence rejecting the bail application.

We have faith in the judiciary and hope that farmers will get justice in the times to come.

SC cancels Ashish Mishra’s bail: Ashish will be able to appeal for bail again.

However, after the decision of the court, Ashish Mishra also got relief. Now he can appeal for bail again.

According to the order of the Supreme Court, he can move a fresh petition to the Allahabad Court for fresh bail.

The court had reserved the decision on April 4.

A bench of Chief Justice NV Ramana, Justice Hima Kohli, and Justice Suryakant gave the verdict on the petition for cancellation of bail.

The High Court’s decision to grant bail was challenged by the families of those killed in the violence.

At the same time, the bench of Justice Ramana, after hearing the arguments of all the parties, had reserved the decision on April 4 itself.

On the other hand, the Supreme Court had also objected to the High Court’s decision during the hearing in which ‘irrelevant’ information in the FIR and the post-mortem report was considered as the basis for granting bail to accused Ashish Mishra.

UP government also opposed bail.

The UP government had also strongly opposed the bail plea of ​​Ashish Mishra in the apex court.

However, UP Governments’s lawyer had also said that comprehensive protection has been provided to the witnesses connected with the case.

He had said that it is wrong to say that the accused can harm the witnesses, as they have made elaborate security arrangements for everyone.

The family of the deceased had appealed.

The families of the farmers killed in the violence had filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking a stay on the bail order of the High Court.

It was said in the petition that this decision is not correct in the eyes of law, as no meaningful and effective assistance has been given by the government.

However, earlier, advocates Shiv Kumar Tripathi and CS Panda had filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking cancellation of Ashish Mishra’s bail, on which the apex court had taken suo motu cognizance.

This is the whole matter.

Let us tell you that this case pertains to the violence that took place on Oct 3 last year in the Lakhimpur Kheri district during the visit of the Deputy CM of Uttar Pradesh Keshav Prasad Maurya to the area.

Some farmers were opposing Keshav Prasad’s visit, on which an SUV car was rammed at high speed and the farmers were crushed.

A driver and two BJP workers were thrashed to death by angry farmers following the violence.

It is alleged that Ashish Mishra was riding in this vehicle and he had done it under a conspiracy.